Webcasting
A Right to Privacy at Seminars?
So, let’s open a can of worms and ask the question: Is there a right of privacy for clients and others attending an event you are webcasting or videotaping? That is, can you include shots of the audience, broadcast their questions and capture their image (whether intentional or not) without seeking their express permission?
In my view, there is no right of privacy in this setting and permission is not expressly required. That said, there are some things you can and should do to ensure no one complains. Also, quite apart from the privacy rights issue, any video shot or broadcast and used for commercial purposes may indeed require some form of notice to attendees or even a release/consent form.
First, let’s talk about privacy rights in a seminar, workshop or other similar setting. I’ve had this discussion recently with a treasured client that wanted to ensure there would be no shots showing audience members (even the backs of heads) and no broadcast of the Q&A portion of the program. Why? The client believed there were “privacy rights” at stake. Well, no, there are not. Seminars, workshops and the like are public or invitational events, and there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in attending the event or asking questions in public. Yes, privacy legislation in Canada does control organizations collecting “personal information” and information that might specifically identify people, but there are exemptions for information that is publicly available. When you walk into a store and your image is captured on closed-circuit cameras, for example, you have no legal right to object to the collection of that information (though, Canada’s Privacy Commissioner doesn’t like CCTV cameras that capture passersby outside the store). While purely aesthetic reasons for keeping people’s heads bobbing in and out of shots are absolutely correct, there is no legal basis in my view for concern about privacy.
Next, though, let’s think about the fact that a webcast or video capture of an event is for commercial purposes. During my career as a journalist, I didn’t have to worry much about this since newsgathering is typically considered non-commercial and exempted from such restrictions. A corporate event, however, is commercial in nature (even though it’s often framed as an educational occasion). In this regard, there are some concerns that could be raised by clients or others attending who might object to the use of their image for a commercial purpose, such as post-event replays for other clients. It’s not unusual, for example, to see TV shows pixelate corporate logos on T-shirts or business signage to avoid claims for misappropriation of image.
Short of getting a written consent from every audience member captured on camera, there are some precautions organizations can take:
- Post a General Notice: Near the seminar entrance or on the sign-in table, post a notice stating prominently: “This event will be videotaped and/or webcast”.
- Announce Before Event Begins: Before the proceedings get underway or during the moderator’s introduction, tell audience members that the proceedings are being taped or broadcast, and to keep that in mind when asking questions or moving about the facility.
- Implied Consent Notice: Better yet, do as some seminar companies do and include a notice in the sign-up materials or Web page for the event. Here’s an example adapted from one seminar provider: “Videotaping Policy: During this event, ABC Company will be videotaping and broadcasting. Most likely, you will be filmed, recorded or photographed as part of the audience. By your attendance, you grant permission to be videotaped, audiotaped or photographed for commercial purposes and agree to the following: being recorded, filmed, videotaped, or photographed by any means; commercial or any other use of your likeness, voice and words without compensation; specifically waiving all rights of privacy during the videotaping, filming, recording or photographing and releasing ABC Company from liability for loss, damage, or compensation from the commercial or other use of your likeness, image, voice or word.“
- Raise the Cameras or Fix it in Post-Production: The solution we have hit on that works best is to raise the cameras to a height where the audience is not visible (about 7 ft. or so). There is still a small chance that someone will stand up or walk by a speaker (particularly speakers who remain seated at a table), but we are usually able to switch to a different camera for 10-15 seconds or edit it out later. The one downside to this approach is that you are restricted in the types of camera shots available. For example, with no wide shots of the audience, you can choose from only a few different shots of the speakers.
It’s a complex issue, but with some precautions, you can safely and effectively deliver your event through the Web and recorded video.
Online Political Rally Draws Massive “Virtual Crowd”
Canada’s Liberal Party scored a “first” recently with a live and interactive “Town Hall” webcast. The event, designed to unveil the Party’s platform, reportedly drew a crowd of over 9,300 unique viewers and elicited nearly 1,000 questions through Facebook, Twitter and the Party’s website. The Party believes online webcasts can reverse the trend toward declining voter turnout.
Couldn’t agree more. We saw the power of the Internet to rally voters in the 2008 U.S. presidential election and we will see it in Canada as more politicos recognize that most people would prefer to spend time sitting in front of their computer screens than answering the door bell and politely listening to campaigners ineffectively chat them up.
Webcasting can be a highly effective tool for political parties, as well as anyone else with key messages to communicate. It is amazingly cost-effective (imagine the costs and logistics of hosting a crowd of 9,000 in a public hall or hotel). You control the messaging and questions you choose to answer, you can track viewership, you likely get some press coverage, and the event can also be recorded for playback on-demand.
There are plenty of other options for politicos interested in leveraging video. Imagine launching a series of YouTube 4-5 minute clips with your candidate talking heart-to-heart about why the constituency is near and dear, why he or she feels a connection to their issues and what the Party can do differently. Or, imagine a candidate hosting a webcast interactive “fireside chat” regularly or throughout a campaign from the local constituency office, fielding online or emailed questions. After the event, it’s loaded onto YouTube.
Video and webcasting are not the be-all-to-end-all of communications methods, but they do offer a highly personal way to inexpensively engage thousands of people at once.
Online Video Streaming Soaring
Nielsen Media Research, the audience measuring service, reports that video streaming on the Internet is ramping up seriously. As of January 2011, year-over-year, video streaming itself is up 31.5% over 2010. That’s 14.5 billion video streaming sessions. Nielsen says even though the number of “unique video viewers” only rose 3.1% (i.e., a modest rise in the online population viewing), those same viewers streamed 28% more video than in the previous year. They also spent an average of 45% more time watching online video. Obviously, people are growing more comfortable with online video as a communications vehicle.
And, what types of videos? Not surprisingly, movies and music videos are among the most popular subject-matter. YouTube, with its mix of wacky and legitimate video clips, is the undisputed king of content delivery networks, with 8.5 billion video streams delivered, or 10 times that of its nearest competitor, Hulu.
Enhanced Audio Podcasts: Effective Communications Tools
While webcasting and video are exciting tools, I have to tell you I still have a soft spot in my heart for audio podcasts. Particularly, short and informative bursts that harken back to the days of radio. Too often, though, it’s tough for clients to make them short, so what I often recommend is the Enhanced Podcast. With an Enhanced Podcast, audio is paired with the equivalent of a Flash-based slide presentation. They look great, are easier to listen to then a pure audio podcast and can include a lot of great information. They can even be click-able and send you off to a Web page.
Here’s a great example of one we did for the Securities Litigation Group at Cassels Brock (the full podcast series is here).
Enhanced podcasts are a simple, quick and cost-effective way to communicate with clients, shareholders or employees. Using the latest audio recording tools, podcasts can be created easily onsite — in your own offices. If need be, the turnaround time from recording to finished product is just hours (perfect for events such as the Federal Budget). Whether it’s a major announcement, a news release, a CEO’s monthly fireside chat, a training session or an informational interview with your own in-house experts or customers, podcasts are an excellent communications vehicle. I identify at least five key advantages enhanced audio podcasts have over video:
- Rapid response time to events. Preparation time is far less than other formats, such as video or even writing. Your podcast is ready for upload to your Web site in hours or easily distributed by email.
- Convenient format for information. People much prefer listening to reading a long article or announcement.
- You control everything. Ultimately, unlike traditional public relations tools, you control the message. And you control the quality. We edit podcasts for brevity, interview subjects can start over when they stumble, ums and ahhs are removed.
- Easy to do. A simple Q&A format, for example, can take the pressure off the interview subject and enhance your audience’s listening experience.
- Last and best of all, it can all be done in your offices where it’s most convenient for you and your people.
Give us a call and learn more about how podcasts can help add a new dimension to your communication strategies.